In terms of Deaf and hearing equivalences, which model is most likely to challenge the notion of expertise?

The Bicultural Model is the most likely to challenge the notion of expertise because it emphasizes the importance of both Deaf and hearing cultures in the interpreting process. This model acknowledges that interpreters must navigate and embody both cultural frameworks, rather than just functioning as a bridge between them. It recognizes that the Deaf community has its own unique set of experiences, values, and norms, which are equally important to consider alongside the hearing perspective.

By promoting an understanding of these distinct cultural contexts, the Bicultural Model implies that expertise is not solely based on linguistic proficiency or technical skills, but also on a deep understanding of the cultural nuances and lived experiences of the Deaf community. This challenges traditional ideas of expertise, as it asserts that knowledge and competence in interpretation extend beyond mere interpretation skills to include cultural fluency and responsiveness.

In contrast, the other models—like the Conduit Model or Communication Facilitator—often present interpreting more as a mechanical or neutral act of transferring information, which does not engage with the cultural complexities central to Deaf and hearing interactions. These models may reinforce the idea of the interpreter as a mere facilitator rather than a cultural mediator, which does not adequately address the multifaceted nature of interpreting practice as highlighted by the Bicultural Model.